Biomechanical analysis of head injury caused by a charge explosion under an armored vehicle

Monika Ratajczak; Roman Fratczak; Grzegorz Sławinski; Tadeusz Niezgoda; Romuald Bedzinski

doi:10.24423/cames.180

Monika Ratajczak University of Zielona Góra
Roman Fratczak Nobo Solutions S.A.
Grzegorz Sławinski Military University of Technology
Tadeusz Niezgoda Military University of Technology
Romuald Bedzinski University of Zielona Góra

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24423/cames.180

Abstract

In this study, the authors developed the numerical model of brain structure to assess brain injury of a person in military conditions. The numerical model aimed at analyzing changes in the mechanical parameters of brain structure in the conditions of rapid overload. The results of our investigation are intended to contribute to the explanation of the phenomena of degradation of brain structures among soldiers.

Keywords

FEM, biomechanics of brain injury, combat conditions,

References

[1] E. Lanier Summerall. Report of (VA) Consensus Conference: Practice Recommendations for Treatment of Veterans with Comorbid TBI, Pain, and PTSD. 17 pages, 2010.
[2] http://dvbic.dcoe.mil/dod-worldwide-numbers-tbi.
[3] Independent Review Group. Report on Rebuilding the Trust: Rehabilitative Care and Administrative Processes at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and National Naval Medical Center. 129 pages, April 2007. http://www.nvti.ucdenver.edu/resources/VETSNET/vol15no2/IRG-Report-Final.pdf.
[4] T.W. McAllister. Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury: evaluation and management. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 7: 3–10, 2008. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2327235&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
[5] A.D. Gean. Brain Injury: Applications from War and Terrorism. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA, 2014. https://books.google.com/books?id=nmAGBAAAQBAJ&pgis=1.
[6] E. Wiczkowski, A. Kedzia, A. Kania. Traumatic damage pathomechanism of cerebral vessels caused by geriatric changes. Engineering Transactions, 51(2–3): 339–347, 2003.
[7] T. Klekiel. Biomechanical analysis of lower limb of soldiers in vehicle under high dynamic load from blast event. Series on Biomechanics, 29(2-3): 14–30, 2015. http://www.imbm.bas.bg/biomechanics/uploads/Archive2015-2-3/14-30.pdf.
[8] National Academy of Engineering. Concussion: A National Challenge. The Bridge, 46, 132 pages, Washington, DC, 2016.
[9] E. Krzystała, A. Mezyk, S. Kciuk. Analysis of threat to crew posed by explosion of charge placed under wheeled armoured vehicle [in Polish]. The Journal of Science of the Gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, 1(159): 145–154, 2011.
[10] K. Miller [Ed.]. Biomechanics of the Brain. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. https://books.google.com/books?id=XwS3lOWQXxEC&pgis=1.
[11] P.J. Prendergast. An analysis of theories in biomechanics. Engineering Transactions, 49(2-3): 117–133, 2001.
[12] M. Ratajczak, M. Sasiadek, R. Bedzinski. An analysis of the effect of impact loading on the destruction of vascular structures in the brain. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 18, 2016. doi:10.5277/ABB-00552-2016-02.
[13] G. Sławinski, T. Niezgoda, W. Barnat, M. Wojtkowski. Numerical analysis of the influence of blast wave on human body, Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, 20(3): 381–386, 2013.
[14] M. Fahlstedt, K. Baeck, P. Halldin, J. Vander Sloten, J. Goffin, B. Depreitere, S. Kleiven. Influence of impact velocity and angle in a detailed reconstruction of a bicycle accident. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference, 40: 787–799, 2012.
[15] S. Kleiven. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 51: 81–114, 2007. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18278592.
[16] D.W.A. Brands, P.H.M. Bovendeerd, J.S.H.M. Wismans. On the potential importance of non-linear viscoelastic material modelling for numerical prediction of brain tissue response: test and application. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 46: 103–121, 2002. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096221.
[17] M. Horanin-Dusza. The analysis of the biomechanical and histological properties of cerebral bridging veins in alcoholics and nonalcoholics – the importance in the subdural hematomas etiology [in Polish]. PhD Thesis, Medical University, Wrocław, Poland, 2009.
[18] J.H. McElhaney, P.I. Mate, V.L. Roberts. A new crash test device – “Repeatable Pete”. Proceedings of 17th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1973. doi:10.4271/730983.
[19] A. Schaller, C. Voigt, H. Huempfner-Hierl, A. Hemprich, T. Hierl. Transient finite element analysis of a traumatic fracture of the zygomatic bone caused by a head collision. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41(1): 66–73, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.09.004.
[20] J.A. Galbraith, L.E. Thibault, D.R. Matteson. Mechanical and electrical responses of the squid giant axon to simple elongation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 115: 13–22, 1993. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8445893.
[21] D.I. Shreiber, A.C. Bain, D.F. Meaney. In vivo thresholds for mechanical injury to the blood-brain barrier. Proceedings of 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1997.
[22] A.C. Bain, D.F. Meaney. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 122(6): 615–622, 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11192383.
[23] L. Zhang, K.H. Yang, A.I. King. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 126(2): 226–236, 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15179853.
[24] C. Deck, R. Willinger. Improved head injury criteria based on head FE model. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 13(6): 667–678, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13588260802411523.
[25] C. Zhou, T.B. Khalil, A.I. King. A new model comparing impact responses of the homogeneous and inhomogeneous human brain. SAE Technical Paper 952714. Proceedings of 39th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1995. doi: 10.4271/952714.
[26] M. Claessens, F. Sauren, J. Wismans. Modeling of the human head under impact conditions: A parametric study. Proceedings of 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1997. doi: 10.4271/973338.
[27] R.T. Miller, S.S. Margulies, M. Leoni, M. Nonaka, X. Chen, D.H. Smith. Finite element modeling approaches for predicting injury in an experimental model of severe diffuse axonal injury. SAE Technical Paper 983154, 1998. doi: 10.4271/983154.
[28] D.W. Anderson, W.D. Kalsbeek, T.D. Hartwell. The national head and spinal cord injury survey. Journal of Neurosurgery, 53, Suppl: S19–31, 1980.
[29] J.A. Newman. A generalized acceleration model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT). Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, pp. 121–131, 1986.
[30] R. Willinger, D. Baumgartner. Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 8(6): 605–617, 2003. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2003.0264.
[31] D. Baumgartner, R. Willinger, N. Shewchenko, M.C. Beusenberg. Tolerance limits for mild traumatic brain injury derived from numerical head impact replication. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts (IRCOBI), Isle of Man, 29: 353–355, 2001.
[32] D. Baumgartner, R. Willinger. Numerical modeling of the human head under impact: new injury mechanisms and tolerance limits. In: IUTAM Symposium on Impact Biomechanics: From Fundamental Insights to Applications, M.D. Gilchrist [Ed.]. Springer, pp. 195–203, 2005. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3796-1 20.
[33] R.W.G. Anderson, C.J. Brown, P.C. Blumbergs, G. Scott, J.W. Finney, N.R. Jones, A.J. McLean. Mechanisms of axonal injury: an experimental and numerical study of a sheep model of head impact. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI), Sitges, Spain, pp. 107–120, 1999.
[34] N. Famaey, Z. Ying Cui, G. Umuhire Musigazi, J. Ivens, B. Depreitere, E. Verbeken, J.V. Sloten. Structural and mechanical characterisation of bridging veins: A review. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 41: 222–240, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.009.