Primal- and Dual-Mixed Finite Element Models for Geometrically Nonlinear Shear-Deformable Beams – A Comparative Study

  • Edgár Bertóti University of Miskolc

Abstract

The relationships between the system matrices of the displacement-based, a primal-mixed, a dual-mixed and a consistent primal-dual mixed finite element model for geometrically nonlinear shear-deformable beams are investigated. Employing Galerkin-type weak formulations with the lowest possible order, constant and linear, polynomial approximations, the tangent stiffness matrices and the load vectors of the elements are derived and compared to each other in their explicit forms. The main difference between the standard and the dual-mixed element can be characterized by a geometry-, material- and meshdependent constant that can serve not only as a locking indicator but also to transform the displacement-based element into a shear-locking-free dual-mixed beam element. The numerical performances of the four different elements are compared to each other through two simple model problems. The superior performance of the mixed, and especially the dual-mixed, beam elements in the nonlinear case is demonstrated, not only for the deflection, but also for the force and moment computations.

Keywords

beam, shear-deformable, geometrically nonlinear, primal-mixed, dual-mixed, finite element,

References

1. F. Auricchio, B. Beirão da Veiga, J. Kiendl, C. Lovadina, A. Reali, Locking-free isogeometric collocation methods for spatial Timoshenko rods, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 263: 113–126, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.009.
2. K.-J. Bathe, Finite element procedures, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.
3. K.-J. Bathe, E.N. Dvorkin, A formulation of general shell elements – the use of mixed interpolation of tensorial components, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 22(3): 697–722, 1986, doi: 10.1002/nme.1620220312.
4. E. Bertóti, A comparison of primal- and dual-mixed finite element formulations for Timoshenko beams, Engineering with Computers, 31: 99–111, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00366-013-0333-y.
5. M. Bishoff, W.A. Wall, K.-U. Bletzinger, E. Ramm, Models and finite elements for thin walled structures, [in:] E. Stein, R. de Borst, T.J.R. Hughes [Eds], The Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics Vol. II, pp. 59–137, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004.
6. D. Boffi, F. Brezzi, M. Fortin, Mixed and hybrid finite element methods and applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2013.
7. D. Chapelle, K.-J. Bathe, The finite element analysis of shells – Fundamentals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2nd edition, 2011.
8. M. Géradin, A. Cardona, Flexible multibody dynamics. A finite element approach, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2001.
9. T.J.R. Hughes, The finite element method: Linear static and dynamic finite element analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987.
10. M. Igelbüscher, A. Schwarz, K. Steeger, J. Schröder, Modified mixed least-squares finite element formulations for small and finite strain plasticity, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 117(1): 141–160, 2018, doi: 10.1002/nme.5951.
11. W. Kim, J.N. Reddy, A comparative study of least-squares and the weak-form Galerkin finite element models for the nonlinear analysis of Timoshenko beams, Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2(2): 101–114, 2010.
12. O. Klaas, J. Schröder, E. Stein, C. Miehe, A regularized dual mixed element for plane elasticity. Implementation and performance of the BDM element, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 121(1–4): 201–209, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(94)00701-N.
13. Y. Ko, Y. Lee, P.-S. Lee, K.-J. Bathe, Performance of the MITC3+ and MITC4+ shell elements in widely-used benchmark problems, Computers and Structures, 193: 187–206, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.08.003.
14. E. Marino, Locking-free isogeometric collocation formulation for three-dimensional geometrically exact shear-deformable beams with arbitrary initial curvature, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 324: 546–572, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.06.031.
15. C. Meier, A. Popp, W.A. Wall, Geometrically exact finite element formulations for slender beams: Kirchhoff-Love theory versus Simo-Reissner theory, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 26: 163–243, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11831-017-9232-5.
16. A.K. Noor, J.M. Peters, Mixed models and reduced/selective integration displacement models for nonlinear analysis of curved beams, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 17(4): 615–631, 1981, doi: 10.1002/nme.1620170409.
17. J.P. Pontaza, Least-squares variational principles and the finite element method: theory, formulations, and models for solid and fluid mechanics, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 41(7–8): 703–728, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2004.09.002.
18. E.F. Punch, S.N. Atluri, Large displacement analysis of plates by a stress-based finite element approach, Computers and Structures, 24(1): 107–117, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(86)90339-1.
19. J.N. Reddy, On locking-free shear deformable beam finite elements, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 149(1–4): 113–132, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00075-3.
20. J.N. Reddy, Energy principles and variational methods in applied mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2nd edition, 2002.
21. J.N. Reddy, An introduction to nonlinear finite element analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004.
22. J.E. Roberts, J.-M. Thomas, Mixed and hybrid methods, [in:] P.G. Ciarlet, J.L. Lions [Eds], Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Vol. II, pp. 523–639 North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.
23. J.C. Simo, T.J.R. Hughes, On the variational foundations of assumed strain methods, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 53(1): 51–54, 1986, doi: 10.1115/1.3171737.
24. E. Stein, R. Rolfes, Mechanical conditions for stability and optimal convergence of mixed finite elements for linear plane elasticity, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 84(1): 77–95, 1990, doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(90)90090-9.
25. B. Tóth, Hybridized dual-mixed hp-finite element model for shells of revolution, Computers & Structures, 218: 123–151, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.003.
26. K. Wisniewski, Finite rotation shells: Basic equations and finite elements for Reissner kinematics. Lecture notes on numerical methods in engineering and sciences, CIMNESpringer, Dordrecht, 2010.
Published
Dec 14, 2020
How to Cite
BERTÓTI, Edgár. Primal- and Dual-Mixed Finite Element Models for Geometrically Nonlinear Shear-Deformable Beams – A Comparative Study. Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science, [S.l.], v. 27, n. 4, p. 285–315, dec. 2020. ISSN 2299-3649. Available at: <https://cames.ippt.pan.pl/index.php/cames/article/view/299>. Date accessed: 30 nov. 2021. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24423/cames.299.
Section
Articles